Only twenty scant acres smaller than Zilker Park, the 330-acre tract of former ranchland at the edge of District 1 now known as John Treviño Jr. Metro Park is perhaps the second most underutilized park space in far East Austin.
The first, of course, is Walter E. Long Metro Park, but the almost bizarrely ambitious $800 million master plan for that enormous potential recreational asset many Austinites have never heard of is not exactly the model for improvement nearby residents would prefer for the Treviño property. In fact, their initial feedback seems to imply they’d like the City of Austin’s Parks and Recreation Department to take a lighter touch, and perhaps consider starting out by simply unlocking the gate.
The parkland, which has never been open to the public, is accessed from FM 969 about two and a half miles east from Highway 183, and backs up to the Colorado River at its southern end. Though the area’s clearly got plenty of natural beauty, the site is largely undeveloped outside of a few remaining buildings from its previous life of farming and ranching before the city’s purchase of the land in 2003.
A 2006 City Council vote named the future park for John Treviño Jr., Austin’s first Mexican-American council member, but plans for further development here have been scarce in the years since — besides some speculation in 2016 that massive city-owned tracts of this nature could someday help ease the burden on Zilker Park’s facilities by hosting music festivals and other event programming.
That changed earlier this year with the city’s approval of a contract in January to hire consultants from Seattle landscape architecture firm Gustafson Guthrie Nichol for the development of a master plan towards the park’s improvement. The GGN plan is currently scheduled for completion in early 2020, but at the moment, the architects and parks department are working through the public engagement process to better understand the community’s priorities for the space.
At a meeting earlier this week, representatives of the parks department showed off a few early conclusions from the public engagement already conducted, with a few subsequent planning values identified from that input. We’ll see more specific design concepts later this summer and likely have the opportunity to vote on a few alternatives for development, but at the moment, we just know the existing conditions of the site and the conclusions of the department’s survey results.
Reading between the lines a little, those results already give us a pretty clear picture of what nearby residents would prefer in terms of improvements here: “Make it better, but don’t screw it up.” That’s the synthesis you’ll take away from a lot of community engagement on master plans of this variety, with most people having a better idea of what they don’t want than what they might enjoy. But in the case of Treviño Park, its neighbors — residents of a community historically underserved in terms of the city’s park improvements, it’s worth noting — seem to have a pretty valid point in this case.
The Disneyland-esque master plan for the nearby Walter E. Long Park, though it still has its opponents, feels a bit more acceptable since the lake itself is artificial — created for the cooling needs of a power plant, enabled by a dam, and sustained at its consistent level only with the help of frequent pumping from the Colorado River.
Treviño Park, on the other hand, is almost entirely natural — a mix of open Blackland Prairie fields, mature live oaks, mesquite and ashe juniper thickets, and a biodiverse riparian habitat near the river. In other words, it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to put a Ferris wheel here, and the aforementioned light touch requested by neighbors during this stage of community input looms large over the early visions of the plan.
The focus, as it appears right now, is just getting people inside the park, with trail and transit connectivity as some of the more important priorities — along with preserving as much of the natural habitat as possible, keeping and adapting the existing buildings on the property, and providing safe river access at the rear of the site. Simple amenities like public restrooms and picnic facilities are also high on the list.
But perhaps the most fascinating possible future discussed in these documents for a portion of the parkland is an acknowledgement of its former agricultural history in the form of some kind of community farming — which, in the words of the parks department’s preliminary vision, would “…carry the site’s productive agricultural heritage into the present and future by exploring possibilities for food production and agricultural education.”
Considering the size of the Treviño tract, a fairly large agricultural facility could easily share this parkland with the rest of its desired improvements — something like the parks department’s existing urban gardening program on steroids, with plenty of additional space available for educational facilities. It might sound a little quaint, but the community benefits of urban agricultural programs are pretty well-documented.
This sort of operation lines up uncannily well with a recent unanimous recommendation of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board, regarding the suitability of agriculture on unused city and county-owned land as a component of local sustainability. We’re not saying it’s a done deal, but the odds seem pretty good!
Either way, the real test will arrive on August 24, when the parks department holds its third engagement meeting and presents more specific concepts for this land’s possible future. We’ll be following all the twists and turns, but until then, just knowing this future park exists is a good start — you’d be surprised how many people don’t.
Govalle neighborhood homes for sale
-
$745,000
1008 Muse LN #14
Austin, TX -
$765,000
2906 Kuhlman Ave #A
Austin, TX -
$750,000
2905 Prado ST
Austin, TX -
$829,000
3500 Neal ST
Austin, TX -
$649,500
2901 Glen Rae ST #B
Austin, TX -
$649,000
1101 1/2 Linden ST #2
Austin, TX -
$799,000
1124 Linden ST #A
Austin, TX -
$925,000
2519 Gonzales ST
Austin, TX -
$949,000
1101 1/2 Linden ST #1
Austin, TX -
$999,999
2226 Webberville RD
Austin, TX -
$899,000
1123 1/2 Gunter ST #2
Austin, TX -
$975,000
3303 Kay ST
Austin, TX -
$699,990
3401 Neal ST #B
Austin, TX -
$665,000
3205 Bengston ST
Austin, TX -
$655,000
2813 Castro ST #2
Austin, TX -
$995,000
2906 Webberville RD #1
Austin, TX -
$1,400,000
3012 Stokes DR #1
Austin, TX -
$1,700,000
3201 Holton ST
Austin, TX -
$649,000
606 Springdale RD
Austin, TX -
$650,000
3002 Webberville RD
Austin, TX -
$839,000
2415 E 8th ST
Austin, TX -
$399,900
3202 Kay ST
Austin, TX -
$405,000
2220 Webberville RD #201
Austin, TX -
$449,900
3309 Kay ST
Austin, TX -
$500,000
1007 Cherico ST
Austin, TX
-
Lot Size2,614 sqft
Home Size1,627 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
Lot Size8,987 sqft
Home Size1,946 sqft
Beds5 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
Lot Size6,744 sqft
Home Size1,483 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size10,921 sqft
Home Size1,262 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size3,533 sqft
Home Size1,034 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size7,297 sqft
Home Size1,054 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
Lot Size4,640 sqft
Home Size1,644 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
Lot Size5,097 sqft
Home Size1,812 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
Lot Size7,297 sqft
Home Size1,860 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
Lot Size3,002 sqft
Home Size1,600 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size5,445 sqft
Home Size1,485 sqft
Beds4 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
Lot Size7,205 sqft
Home Size1,724 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size2,788 sqft
Home Size1,066 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths1.5 Baths
-
Lot Size5,681 sqft
Home Size1,154 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size3,128 sqft
Home Size1,010 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
Lot Size4,008 sqft
Home Size2,032 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
Lot Size7,188 sqft
Home Size2,242 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3.5 Baths
-
Lot Size7,188 sqft
Home Size2,794 sqft
Beds4 Beds
Baths4.5 Baths
-
Lot Size6,970 sqft
Home Size1,238 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size7,497 sqft
Home Size1,128 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot Size6,491 sqft
Home Size1,613 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
Lot Size5,611 sqft
Home Size936 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot SizeN/A
Home Size650 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot Size5,768 sqft
Home Size1,040 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot Size9,122 sqft
Home Size1,144 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths2 Baths
Leave a Reply