
An illustration of the 311 West Sixth Street building from a 1986 Austin American-Statesman ad for Beans Restaurant & Bar, which occupied the space at the time. Image: Austin History Center
The 60-story downtown Austin apartment and office tower planned at 321 West Sixth Street by banking outfit BBVA USA and national developer Ryan Companies is one step closer to breaking ground at its 0.47-acre site on the southeast corner of West Sixth and Guadalupe Streets, despite a few setbacks on the national stage making the timing of that groundbreaking unclear for the moment.
At its monthly meeting held earlier this week via Zoom with only a few technical difficulties, the City of Austin’s Historic Landmark Commission approved the demolition of a 1927 structure occupying a small part of the future tower’s footprint at 311 West Sixth Street. That 4,794-square-foot structure, though its charming and partially ivy-covered brick facades feel right at home for the north edge of the city’s historically-interesting Warehouse District, isn’t actually historic — at least not officially speaking. Turns out it’s just old.
This is good news for the (very narrow!) BBVA tower, and terrible news for fans of Maiko Sushi Lounge, which has occupied the building since 2005, the last of a string of eateries operating out of the space since the 1930s — before then, it was a Maytag appliance store. Its most prominent tenant was Italian restaurant and deli Caruso’s Cafe, which operated from 1931 until its owner Pasquale Caruso’s death in 1966.

An Austin American-Statesman ad for Caruso’s Cafe dating back to November 1935. Image: Austin History Center
Among other reasons for its lack of eligibility for historic designation, it turns out the building’s been messed with a little too much in recent years to its detriment — though you wouldn’t necessarily be able to tell from the street, the western half is actually an addition dating back only a few decades at most, designed to match the rest of the structure by looking older than it is. The facade of the truly old part of the building is heavily modified with glass and steel to become the restaurant’s front window, and even though its upgrades look really good, that’s also not great news:
The building is a one-story brick commercial building with some ornamental brickwork in the raised bricks forming patterns in the storefront and the stepped parapet wall; however, the storefront has been modified with the installation of a modern metal-framed window and door system. The building reflects a common type and does not appear to have the architectural distinction to qualify as a historic landmark.
— Historic Landmark Commission Staff Comments, April 27, 2020
The ivy currently growing over basically the entire brick crown of the old section’s facade hides a lot, but you can see the ornamental brickwork better from this street view below taken back in 2014, when someone cleared it off for a bit — the ivy, not prone to messing around, has since grown back to its current density on the building.
Even if it’s not historic historic, it’s a structure with character far exceeding the bank next door that will also be demolished for the sake of this new project — and even if it hurts a little, losing the 1927 building in favor of the BBVA tower is worth it if it means we can also banish a land use as embarrassingly inefficient as a single-story drive-thru bank on a major corner in the middle of downtown. Wouldn’t feel right to have something like that sitting directly across the intersection from the new tallest tower in the city — it would be like an Arby’s sitting next door to the Independent. Now we just need to hit the post office across the street with the world’s largest wrecking ball.

An aerial view of the BBVA tower site at the southeastern corner of West Sixth and Guadalupe Streets. Image: Bing Maps
Though there isn’t a set date for the demolition at this point, its application documents indicate the old building can come down once the BBVA tower’s site plan is approved by the city — and that process is ongoing, though it’s unclear exactly how a recession could impact the timeline of the tower’s construction even after its plan is approved. Depending on what happens to local development over the next few months, a big national outfit like Ryan Companies might have an easier time keeping the wheels spinning on this project, but trying to predict anything at the moment runs the risk of making you look kinda goofy somewhere down the road.
Latest Downtown Austin Condos For Sale
-
$798,500
44 East Avenue #3008
Austin, TX -
$925,000
44 East Avenue #3807
Austin, TX -
$1,450,000
44 East Avenue #1801
Austin, TX -
$1,100,000
44 East Avenue #3806
Austin, TX -
$1,678,000
44 East Avenue #1705
Austin, TX -
$1,325,000
40 N Interstate 35 #10A2
Austin, TX -
$550,000
44 East Avenue #1706
Austin, TX -
$775,000
507 Sabine Street #601
Austin, TX -
$620,000
360 Nueces Street #3603
Austin, TX -
$689,000
48 East Avenue #1805
Austin, TX -
$399,900
507 Sabine Street #610
Austin, TX -
$825,000
501 West Avenue #902
Austin, TX -
$789,000
603 Davis Street #2204
Austin, TX -
$2,195,000
200 CONGRESS Avenue #21E
Austin, TX -
$3,499,000
555 E 5th Street #3022
Austin, TX
-
Lot SizeN/A
Home Size793 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot SizeN/A
Home Size796 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size436 sqft
Home Size1,293 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot SizeN/A
Home Size796 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size96 sqft
Home Size1,228 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size1,961 sqft
Home Size2,536 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
Lot SizeN/A
Home Size538 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot Size227 sqft
Home Size1,454 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size101 sqft
Home Size728 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot Size61 sqft
Home Size706 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot Size88 sqft
Home Size682 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot Size53 sqft
Home Size846 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
Lot Size175 sqft
Home Size1,193 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size131 sqft
Home Size1,918 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
Lot Size393 sqft
Home Size3,638 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3 Baths
Leave a Reply