An illustration of early Austin, long before it grew to the outer lots of the original city plan. Image: Austin History Center
Have you noticed that Austin’s street grid appears to exist outside the standard bounds of geometry? 12th Street jogs out at an angle once it crosses I-35, 28th Street is parallel to 27th Street — but not to 29th Street — and First Street intersects with Seventh Street (just past its intersection with Fifth Street). The man at fault for this jumble is William Sandusky, whose apparent hatred for orderly transportation has saddled central Austin with not one, but seven grids.
Austin is unique among Texas cities in that it was designed from the beginning as a government town. The second president of the Republic of Texas, Mirabeau Lamar, decided to move the capital from Houston — the city named after his political rival — to an undeveloped area of central Texas he found particularly beautiful. (That’s sort of like if John Adams decided in 1796 to move the capital of the United States to Kentucky because he hated George Washington.) In 1838 the Republic of Texas acquired 7,000 acres, approximately 11 square miles, along the Colorado River for the home of a new capital city — and Edwin Waller, who eventually became Austin’s first mayor, received the unique privilege of laying out our well-known downtown grid.
An 1853 map of Waller’s original plan for the City of Austin. Image: Austin History Center
Waller’s grid was a mile square, and extended from the river to present-day Fifteenth Street (then called North Avenue) and from East Avenue (now I-35) to West Avenue (still West Avenue). It created four public squares, including Republic Square, Brush Square, Wooldridge Square, and the long-lost Hamilton Square, along with a jail, a school, and an arsenal. The centerpiece was the future state capitol grounds, situated on a hill overlooking the Colorado River. For the most part it’s a pretty good grid, and has served Austin well.
Enter William Sandusky. While Waller was charged with defining the city’s core, Sandusky’s responsibility was laying out Austin’s remaining 7,000 acres of government land. These were to be known as the city’s “outlots,” as opposed to the “inlots” of Waller’s grid. A key goal, more key even than orderly city planning, was allowing the government to easily sell those lots to support the fledgling Republic, which was deeply in debt — possibly due at least in part to randomly relocating its capital city. Sandusky only had a few months and not much in the way of resources for this task.
This map shows outlots in Division O — this is approximately the Holly neighborhood. After division, they were auctioned off by the Republic of Texas to raise money. Note that Outlot 51 was purchased by Anson Jones, future president of Texas. The full map can be found here. Image: General Land Office
Sandusky conducted physical surveys of the tracts around Austin before devising his plan. Rather than continuing Waller’s grid, he divided the outlots into seven different divisions — and almost every division had its own grid system that did not meaningfully intersect with the adjacent divisions. His scheme extends from West of Lamar Boulevard almost as far east as Springdale Road, and in some places as far north as 45th Street.
Sandusky’s original plan for the outlots of Austin, with its seven separate divisions highlighted. Image: Texas General Land Office / Austin Daily History
The maps seen above and below show the different divisions Sandusky created, and how they line up with the layout of modern Austin. Divisions O, A, and B are considered Central East Austin. Division C is approximately the Cherrywood neighborhood. Division X and Division D divide the University of Texas campus between them. Division X holds the east half of campus and continues up through Hyde Park, while Division D contains the university’s original 40 acres, West Campus, and North University. Division E is north downtown, and Division Z gets everything west of Shoal Creek.
As the map shows, Austin has developed along the lines of Sandusky’s 1840 layout. Click for a larger view. Image: Google Maps / Austin Daily History
Remember, Sandusky wasn’t putting roads on the ground, merely lines atop vast reaches of forest and prairie delineating parcels of land suitable for sale. But as Austin built out into the outlots, the roads that were eventually built broadly followed the orientation of Sandusky’s divisions. I-35, for instance, starts where the original downtown intersects Division O, then juts out to the right.
Topography alone cannot explain how dumb West Campus is.
MLK Jr. Boulevard is also inside Division B — it doesn’t follow the exact lines Sandusky laid out, but is oriented along Division B’s boundary with Division C — a boundary that unfortunately happens to be about 26 degrees askew from the downtown street grid. I-35 follows the boundary between the downtown grid and Divisions O and B, but north of present day MLK Jr. Boulevard, the highway is approximately level with the eastern edge of Division X.
Division D is particularly messed up. Its streets are at a 15 degree angle from the downtown grid and its blocks are offset approximately half a block — meaning there isn’t a single sensible intersection along MLK Jr. Boulevard. It gets worse. Once you get to 29th Street, Sandusky reverted the grid back to being parallel with downtown — which, of course, created a whole new set of terrible intersections. Division D might actually be the earliest example of the State of Texas deliberately screwing Austin.
In North University, 29th Street is parallel to 18th Street, but not 28th Street. And what is 28 1/2 street even doing?
Even if he wasn’t drawing roads, Sandusky almost certainly knew the city would develop along the lines he created. So what explains this terrible grid, which flies in the face of contemporary urban planning even to the passive observer? It’s not like these concepts were unknown at the time, either. Sandusky was from Ohio — though not Sandusky, Ohio — a state subject to the 1785 Federal Land Ordinance, which mandated a grid-like system for every settlement in the United States’ newly-acquired territory west of the Appalachians, north of the Ohio River, and east of the Mississippi River (essentially the modern-day Midwest).
Topography is one potential reason for Sandusky’s shenanigans. There’s a ridgeline along 11th and Rosewood Streets that may explain the grid turn between Division B and Division O. West Campus’ turn could be partially explained by College Hill, where the UT Tower now stands: Sandusky drew a square around that hill and then based the grid on that square rather than the downtown square. But then why deliberately offset that grid a few feet from the downtown grid? And why, about a half mile north of campus, reorient the grid? Topography doesn’t explain everything here.
Unfortunately Sandusky’s motivations appear lost to time — no convenient manifestos titled something like “I Hate the City of Austin and All Who Will Dwell There.” He also died young, in 1847 at the age of 33, long before the results of his plan could become as clear as they are nearly 180 years later. Even more baffling is the fact that Sandusky was also involved in the planning of Galveston, with a grid so precise you could use it for graph paper.
Galveston’s city plan was also done by William Sandusky, but it’s much more sensible. Image: University of Houston Digital Library
But his reasoning could go back to the original goal of the divisions — selling land. The folks who bought the land — for farms, hunting lodges, and cabins — might not have wanted to feel like they were close to the city. Putting these tracts askew from the main grid would have helped preserve a sense of natural beauty and wilderness — connecting the city, though it sounds crazy now, was only a secondary concern.
So, the next time you’re stuck at the intersection of Lavaca Street and MLK Jr. Boulevard, or perhaps when you see a bus coming at you the wrong way on Guadalupe Street, remember the man whose total lack of long-term vision saddled us with the grim, unworkable transportation system we know and desperately work to fix in the present day. Screw you, Sandusky!
Latest Downtown Austin Condos For Sale
-
$1,200,000
70 Rainey Street #1509
Austin, TX -
$2,800,000
210 Lavaca Street #2103
Austin, TX -
$722,000
360 Nueces Street #3301
Austin, TX -
$235,000
1800 Lavaca Street #605
Austin, TX -
$1,277,000
48 East Avenue #1210
Austin, TX -
$1,995,000
1211 W Riverside Drive #3D
Austin, TX -
$1,233,000
222 West Avenue #1802
Austin, TX -
$680,000
800 Embassy Drive #429
Austin, TX -
$799,000
360 Nueces Street #1217
Austin, TX -
$1,020,000
210 Lee Barton Drive #602
Austin, TX -
$1,169,000
901 W 9th Street #219
Austin, TX -
$4,250,000
1211 W Riverside Drive #3B
Austin, TX -
$4,250,000
1211 W Riverside Drive #6A
Austin, TX -
$1,495,000
800 Embassy Drive #605
Austin, TX -
$789,900
48 East Avenue #1908
Austin, TX
-
$1,200,000Lot SizeN/A
Home Size1,128 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$2,800,000Lot Size170 sqft
Home Size2,162 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
$722,000Lot Size88 sqft
Home Size801 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$235,000Lot Size271 sqft
Home Size608 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$1,277,000Lot Size105 sqft
Home Size1,277 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$1,995,000Lot Size1.16 ac
Home Size1,419 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$1,233,000Lot Size284 sqft
Home Size990 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$680,000Lot SizeN/A
Home Size1,110 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$799,000Lot Size131 sqft
Home Size1,115 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$1,020,000Lot Size645 sqft
Home Size1,600 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$1,169,000Lot Size305 sqft
Home Size1,098 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$4,250,000Lot SizeN/A
Home Size2,713 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths4 Baths
-
$4,250,000Lot Size14,811 sqft
Home Size2,351 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
$1,495,000Lot Size806 sqft
Home Size1,978 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
$789,900Lot Size66 sqft
Home Size803 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
Leave a Reply