The “pompous” entrance of One American Center — now called 600 Congress — in 1986. Image: Newsweek
Are you old enough to remember when people cared about Newsweek? If so, you might also recall January 1986, when the magazine’s late arts and architecture critic Douglas Davis called Austin’s newly-booming skyline part of a “riot of wretched excess” breaking out across cities worldwide. The culprit? Postmodern architecture, with all its playfully goofy ornamentation and pastiche of historical styles.
“By common consent, the old glass boxes were boring. But they were at least reticent. Their successors, in contrast, are often aggressively ugly, as unforgettable as bad dreams,” he writes, in a paragraph seemingly designed to make me Google the definition of “reticent” because it’s been a decade since I took the SAT.
When Davis talks about “reticent” glass boxes, he’s describing what’s called the International Style, a subset of modernist architecture technically dating back to the 1920s but frequently describing a specific style of tower built in the postwar period up until the late 1970s — a good example seen on the right of the image above is the charming black monolith of Austin’s own Bank of America Center, built in 1975. These buildings are almost instantly recognizable for their general “boxiness,” a result of their stylistic rejection of ornamentation and frequent use of materials like glass, steel, and concrete. So, when Davis talks about reticent buildings, he’s saying this style can be ugly or pretty while remaining generally restrained, whereas the whimsical nature of postmodern buildings makes them impossible to ignore whether you like them or not. Image: Google / KBS Realty Advisors
“Thanks to the reviving economy, which surged just as the winds of architectural fashion changed, postmodern monsters are rising everywhere,” Davis continues. “They are particularly noticeable in smaller cities like Austin, Texas, which have boomed since 1980. Austin’s genteel, low-lying skyline is now dominated by a baroque, three-towered, 32-story presence known as One American Center.”
Yep, he’s upset about One American Center — the iconic ’80s skyscraper in the heart of downtown recently rebranded as 600 Congress:
A model of the One American Center tower produced by its developer Rust Properties back before we could do much fancier architectural renderings with the computer. Image: The Alcalde, Spring 1983 / Google Books
The building is clad in granite, limestone, and bronze-tinted glass and strung like a Christmas tree with picturesque conceits. Down near the street, three barrel vaults swell above an arched entrance. Inside, the atrium is a jumble of columns, gold deco lamps, and a two-story fountain that cascades down a massive set of granite steps.
A single One American Center in a city like Austin is tolerable. Surrounded by its equally pompous neighbors, however, its punch lines will fall flat. On Congress Avenue, the city’s main thoroughfare, there is now one gaping hole after another, all future sites of “PM” buildings.
— Douglas Davis, Newsweek, 1986
The “pompous neighbors” Davis calls out here, judging by the year of his article’s publication, would be prominent 1980s developments like 100 Congress, 301 Congress, One Eleven Congress, and San Jacinto Center — in other words, towers constituting much of the classic “Old Austin” skyline as I think it’s imagined by quite a few locals under the age of 50 or thereabouts.
Here’s what downtown Austin looked like if you grew up in the late ’80s or ’90s. This photo was taken sometime after San Jacinto Center’s opening in 1987 and before the removal of the “golden mirror” from Chase Tower in 1994. Image: r/Austin
To Austinites in this age range, myself included, such a grim assessment of the city’s architecture doesn’t come naturally. Despite their slightly dull tones of beige and brown, the skyline Davis claims these ’80s-era buildings garishly dominate represents the “before” image of Austin, to be compared against its future growth forever:
This just reinforces the lesson we learned while evaluating the initial criticism of the Frost Bank Tower at the time of its completion in 2004 versus the building’s modern status as one of Austin’s most beloved works of architecture — if it seems like people hate something new on the skyline, just give it 10 or 15 years and they’ll probably tell you it’s part of the city’s intangible cultural heritage.
If you were listening closely, this was really the big takeaway from KUT Austin editor Matt Largey’s ATXplained story last week (featuring a cameo from yours truly) about recent criticism of the Independent condo tower’s “unfinished” crown — Largey said the idea of anyone not liking the Frost Bank Tower blew his mind, since to him it’s probably still the most iconic building on our skyline.
In turn, it’s just as strange for me to imagine someone thinking there’s anything obnoxious or pompous about One American Center, since it’s probably my favorite single piece of architecture from our original 1980s boom and makes me feel like I’m home whenever I see it. Buildings mean different things to different people.
To be fair, the local media didn’t take this criticism lying down. Statesman real estate writer Kim Tyson actually tracked down a response from a partner at Morris/Aubrey Associates, the Houston architecture firm behind One American Center’s design:
A selection from the January 18, 1986 edition of the Austin American-Statesman. Image: Austin History Center
Despite the local cameo, Davis’ article is really a broader criticism of postmodern design’s tendency to mine its inspiration from historical architecture, creating buildings with arches and Greek columns and elaborately decorated facades that, to Davis at least, paid homage to the past without expressing the values of the present — in his words, “a string of architectural Disneylands stretching from coast to coast.”
I don’t think Davis is a bad critic — no joke, I really get a kick out of his thoughtful consideration of fast food restaurant design as it relates to the postmodern inclination towards deconstructing generic retail architecture, and his body of work seems to indicate his concerns about certain aspects of postmodernism’s design influences aren’t ignorant or reactionary. To be fair, some of his general points were probably valid at the time — not every postmodern building looks as good as One American Center — but 33 years later, Austin appears to have bounced back pretty well.
We’re going to have to get used to this whole “600 Congress” thing. Image: Endeavor Real Estate Group
Anyway, architecture is about much more than winning the unanimous approval of fussy critics or the public, particularly since the priorities of each group vary so wildly that a project one likes will often horrify the other — but it’s hard not to wonder if we’ll ever get a building Austinites love from the get-go. Is this city doomed to repeat its cycle of criticism, acceptance, and finally outright praise for anything interesting we build here? In other words, must time be a flat circle?
In the end, our intrepid critic himself inadvertently foreshadowed Austin’s best chance for a tower that would finally bring us all together. In another 1986 Newsweek article, Davis praised the designs of architect César Pelli, calling his creations “…lyrical, technically sophisticated buildings that are neither ‘modern’ nor ‘postmodern.’” Each of Pelli’s works, he said, “attempts to please on many levels at once, captivating clients and public but frustrating critics.”
A rendering of the Block 185 tower. Image: Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects
Pelli, who died last week at the age of 92, built a generation of iconic skyscapers with his firm, Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects — and one of its last projects revealed before his death was Block 185, a 35-story office tower already in the early stages of construction in downtown Austin. I think Davis would have liked it.
Latest Downtown Austin Condos For Sale
-
$900,000
313 W 17th ST #1906
Austin, TX -
$678,000
313 W 17th ST #1702
Austin, TX -
$1,195,000
313 W 17th ST #2005
Austin, TX -
$450,000
800 Embassy DR #412
Austin, TX -
$1,299,444
44 East Ave #2605
Austin, TX -
$1,725,000
210 Lavaca ST #2312
Austin, TX -
$810,000
603 Davis ST #1202
Austin, TX -
$305,000
507 Sabine ST #604
Austin, TX -
$1,349,000
200 Congress Ave #27A
Austin, TX -
$550,000
603 Davis ST #1901
Austin, TX -
$2,000,000
200 Congress Ave #19F
Austin, TX -
$435,000
300 Bowie ST #2106
Austin, TX -
$1,875,000
313 W 17th ST #1607
Austin, TX -
$1,390,000
44 East Ave #3105
Austin, TX -
$790,000
360 Nueces ST #1216
Austin, TX
-
$900,000Lot Size75 sqft
Home Size942 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$678,000Lot Size61 sqft
Home Size772 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$1,195,000Lot Size92 sqft
Home Size1,192 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths2 Baths
-
$450,000Lot Size353 sqft
Home Size865 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$1,299,444Lot Size96 sqft
Home Size1,232 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$1,725,000Lot Size131 sqft
Home Size1,587 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
$810,000Lot Size305 sqft
Home Size1,597 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$305,000Lot Size131 sqft
Home Size728 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$1,349,000Lot Size88 sqft
Home Size1,225 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1.5 Baths
-
$550,000Lot Size192 sqft
Home Size1,005 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$2,000,000Lot Size140 sqft
Home Size1,926 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2.5 Baths
-
$435,000Lot Size57 sqft
Home Size565 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$1,875,000Lot Size153 sqft
Home Size1,930 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
$1,390,000Lot Size96 sqft
Home Size1,232 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$790,000Lot Size131 sqft
Home Size1,117 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
Leave a Reply