Image: Wikimedia Commons
The potential redevelopment of the Delta Kappa Gamma Society International Headquarters Building on the west end of downtown Austin into a residential tower by developers Stratus Properties and Chicago architects SCB presents an interesting situation to the City of Austin’s Historic Landmark Commission: what happens when the organization that originally built a historic building — and actually sought its historic designation in the first place — would now instead prefer to demolish it?
The answer, to the commissioners at least, is pretty clear. After a preliminary briefing to the HLC’s Architectural Review Committee last week from the project’s architects and Becky Sadowski, who serves as DKG’s international president, Commissioner Terri Myers indicated that there was basically no way the development replacing the 64-year-old building at the northeast corner of West 12th and San Antonio Streets as envisioned in early renderings would gain the board’s approval.
I appreciate your mission . . . but our mission is to preserve, protect, and promote authentic historic buildings; so I think we’re a little dismayed — it’s one thing to be a contributing building in a historic district, but it’s quite an honor to be individually listed, and that’s what this project is . . . so excuse us if we’re not thrilled about the loss of this building.
— Terri Myers, City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission
A preliminary rendering of the tower’s basic massing and layout. Image: Stratus / SCB
Despite signing off on its own building’s nomination to the National Register of Historic Places in 2012, the DKG society elected to sell the property last year, according to Sadowski, and hopes to ensure its continued operation as a professional society for women educators through the “new financial strength” provided by the redevelopment.
We know DKG is not defined by its building, it is defined by its members across the world.
— Becky Sadowski, President, DKG Society International
The group is working with the developers and architects of the new project to enshrine elements of the 1956 historic building in its design, with a “commemorative space” included in preliminary concept renderings of the project that would evoke what SCB principal Clara Wineberg describes as both the material and cultural history of the old headquarters, by potentially reusing materials from the previous structure and providing a garden or other space to represent the organization’s longtime presence as a gathering place for women.
A possible ground floor plan for a new residential tower at the DKG building site, showing the spaces intended to commemorate the historic structure in various ways. Image: Stratus / SCB
A view of the tower’s ground-floor exterior details — we’re looking at the southern face of the building here. Image: Stratus / SCB
You might think of this project as a gender-bent version of the Royal Arch Masonic Lodge tower plan that also had a tough time finding any fans at the HLC last year — both projects involve fraternal organizations in support of the redevelopment of their architecturally notable downtown headquarters with new towers, and both groups describe these plans as critical for ensuring their ongoing financial solvency.
Posted by Stephanie Keilman Walsh on Tuesday, July 17, 2018
But the Commission is mandated to follow historic preservation guidelines without significant consideration of the needs of a structure’s owners or even its creators, lest considerations of money interrupt the gaze of architectural merit — it’s just that in these two cases, the gulf between preservation goals and the desires of the historic building’s lifelong occupants is a little wider than usual.
Images: United States Department of the Interior / Photo by Dewey Mears
And the building, we should point out, is very attractive — its design by local firm Kuehne, Brooks and Barr represents what its National Register of Historic Places nomination describes as “an excellent local example of postwar modern design . . . incorporating aspects of the International Style in its primary facade, functionalist commercial office design in its planning, and a more traditional residential aesthetic in its interior design and finishes.”
An original architectural drawing from 1955 showing the building’s southern face. Image: United States Department of the Interior / Austin History Center
A drawing of a floor plan for the DKG building’s first level as part of a 1964 renovation by its original architects. Image: United States Department of the Interior / Austin History Center
Notable for the social mores of 1956, the building was reportedly designed with input from the society’s members influencing its construction at every stage, and its final layout was intended to reflect the pioneering spirit of the women’s organization:
Delta Kappa Gamma Society members controlled the building project from start to finish. Society members researched the headquarters buildings of other organizations as well as the work flow of their own organization to determine the most suitable type of building for their own central headquarters office. In 1954, Building Committee members secured a zoning variance with the City of Austin to construct a professional office in a residential zone, interviewed six potential architectural firms, hired the firm Kuehne, Brooks and Barr, and hired a legal consultant. Working closely with the architectural firm, Society members engaged in almost every design decision from recommendations for floor plans and work schedule to specific decisions about the easement, retaining walls, carpentry, millwork, roofing, sheet metal, ironwork, plastering, plumbing, and electrical work.
In 1955, Society members collected enough money to begin construction, approved the final plans, and employed J. M. Odom Construction Company. Society members held elaborate ceremonies for the ground breaking in July of 1955, the laying of the cornerstone in November of 1955, and the final completion in August of 1956. The Society paid for every phase of the construction, furnishings, and equipment upon completion without taking out a loan.
When consulting with the architect R. Max Brooks about the form of the building, Society members agreed to let the “form of the building follow function” . . . This documented decision produced a building that is a good local example of modem commercial design as applied to an office building . . . Most significantly, the women of the Delta Kappa Gamma Society acknowledged that a functionalist scheme would allow their building to be flexible in the arrangement of the interior spaces and accommodate the diverse range of functions that the expanding organization demanded.
— National Register of Historic Places Nomination, DKG Building
It’s unclear at this stage precisely what, if anything, the new project’s developers could do to bring their vision more in line with historic preservation goals at the site. The notion of placing a tower atop the original structure was described as unsuitable by its architects, as the old building is small and apparently couldn’t hold up to that kind of addition without basically rebuilding it from scratch.
On the left, a 1960 view of the building’s entrance, looking north from this perspective. On the right, another 1960 photo of an interior office space in the building. Images: United States Department of the Interior / Photos by Dewey Mears
In keeping with the architectural trends of the era it was built, the structure is significantly set back and actually somewhat walled off from the sidewalks at West 12th and San Antonio Streets, meaning a hypothetical new tower design set atop the old building wouldn’t allow for an activated streetscape as demanded by design guidelines for modern projects — another example of preservation priorities clashing somewhat with current development goals.
The west courtyard of the DKG building in 1960. Image: United States Department of the Interior / Photo by Dewey Mears
As we said last week, the HLC doesn’t have the power to kill this project. The developers are just looking for feedback, and they definitely got it — now we’ll have to wait and see if the design receives any tweaks before showing up again. Even more than most, this plan feels worthy of our attention because its stretch of West 12th Street seems promising as a future development corridor, with several nearby projects raising the possibility that many of the low-density buildings and parking lots in this area could someday grow a lot taller — and as the biggest concept we’ve seen for the immediate area in a while, the design of this tower and its relationship with the historic building it might replace will set a precedent for growth to come.
Latest Downtown Austin Condos For Sale
-
$5,560,500
555 E 5th Street #3006
Austin, TX -
$599,900
54 Rainey Street #1220
Austin, TX -
$1,575,000
301 West Avenue #2008
Austin, TX -
$465,000
507 Sabine Street #306
Austin, TX -
$2,500,000
301 West Avenue #3705
Austin, TX -
$814,999
54 Rainey Street #414
Austin, TX -
$2,800,000
210 Lavaca Street #2103
Austin, TX -
$1,750,000
48 East Avenue #3201
Austin, TX -
$1,300,000
48 East Avenue #1210
Austin, TX -
$865,000
48 SE East Avenue #2508
Austin, TX -
$15,750,000
200 Congress Avenue #54GP
Austin, TX -
$875,000
360 Nueces Street #1216
Austin, TX -
$689,000
48 E East Avenue #2403
Austin, TX -
$775,000
48 East Avenue #2903
Austin, TX -
$825,000
48 East Avenue #1608
Austin, TX
-
$5,560,500Lot Size532 sqft
Home Size5,055 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths4 Baths
-
$599,900Lot Size175 sqft
Home Size750 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$1,575,000Lot SizeN/A
Home Size1,325 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$465,000Lot Size136 sqft
Home Size877 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$2,500,000Lot SizeN/A
Home Size1,830 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
$814,999Lot Size305 sqft
Home Size1,164 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$2,800,000Lot Size170 sqft
Home Size2,162 sqft
Beds3 Beds
Baths3 Baths
-
$1,750,000Lot Size109 sqft
Home Size1,299 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$1,300,000Lot Size105 sqft
Home Size1,277 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$865,000Lot Size66 sqft
Home Size803 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$15,750,000Lot Size349 sqft
Home Size4,465 sqft
Beds4 Beds
Baths5 Baths
-
$875,000Lot Size131 sqft
Home Size1,117 sqft
Beds2 Beds
Baths2 Baths
-
$689,000Lot SizeN/A
Home Size641 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$775,000Lot Size17,904 sqft
Home Size641 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
-
$825,000Lot Size17,904 sqft
Home Size803 sqft
Beds1 Bed
Baths1 Bath
Leave a Reply